Skip to Main Content

EdSurge: Schools Can’t Find Teachers. Do States Need More Credential Rules or Fewer?

Teacher Preparation

Schools Can’t Find Teachers. Do States Need More Credential Rules or Fewer?

“COVID opened the floodgates for what was allowable,” one education leader says.

Original article found here.
By Daniel Mollenkamp
June 12, 2025

For Aspire Public Schools in Los Angeles, the turnaround took a couple of years.

Coming back from the pandemic, the 11 charter schools serving about 4,400 students saw a steep drop in credentialed teachers sticking with their roles. So relying on a program at Alder Graduate School of Education that pays graduate students to work as teachers-in-training, Aspire built an internal pipeline of new educators.

The program has been successful, according to Christopher Carr, executive director for Aspire in Los Angeles. The retention rate for teachers in the network has soared from around 60 percent to 90 percent, Carr reports. The biggest success of the school’s internal pipeline has been in special education, which suffered the highest personnel loss after the pandemic.

But perhaps the best benefit has been that this allows incoming teachers to absorb the culture of Aspire. Aspire focuses on “antiracism,” according to Carr. He credits this approach with helping the network to increase its number of Black teachers, by allowing schools to consciously recruit them. A couple of years ago, around 7 percent of Aspire’s teachers were Black. Now, that number has doubled, to around 14 percent.

But it’s still really hard to attract math and science teachers for middle school and high school: “It’s almost impossible to find a physics teacher right now,” he says.

Still, to the extent Aspire schools have been successful recruiting and keeping teachers, the chain is in a rare position.

In California, like elsewhere in the country, teacher pipelines are drying up.

Nationally, states have relaxed educator credential requirements to help schools navigate workforce issues. But without greater investment into alternative teacher-training pipelines, some experts worry that schools’ struggle to find and keep teachers will only get worse.

But at the same time, some states have had to make rules more strict: Texas has reversed course on educator credentials, from 2001 — when the state loosened regulations and functionally allowed teachers-in-training to rely on fully online programs — to this year, when it passed a new law to reduce reliance on underqualified educators.

State experiments with strict and lenient credential rules have not yet yielded definitive solutions.

Comparative Advantage

California has some of the most robust teacher qualification requirements, says Beatrice Viramontes, executive director of Teach for America Bay Area.

The state’s education system desperately needs quality teachers in schools, but the traditional credential requirements are expensive and include a lot of steps for prospective teachers, Viramontes says. It creates an additional barrier to boosting staff numbers — along with other hurdles like pay — and schools are having a difficult time attracting teachers, especially among younger generations. Gen Z and millennial teachers tend to leave the field earlier. It means that, as older teachers retire, it’s harder to replace them with quality new hires, Viramontes says.

Solving the problem has required schools to take on a DIY spirit.

“There’s a lot of energy in getting creative, because the current process is cumbersome,” Viramontes says.

Teach for America is an alternative pathway into teaching that works in partnership with teacher credentialing programs. Since the pandemic, schools have started creating their own in-house alternative training programs, too. Some of these try to even usher students currently working to earn a bachelor’s degree through the credential process.

Viramontes praises some approaches as “innovative.” For instance, there’s Rivet, a paraprofessional program that works to bring students pursuing a bachelor’s into classrooms; and TeachStart, a teacher academy that specializes in pathways to credential substitute teachers.

But others have warned about teacher quality issues when schools have to rely on substitutes and other uncredentialed instructors.

California doesn’t have good metrics for weighing the quality of these alternative programs, Viramontes concedes. Yet, anecdotally, she says there’s a steady flow of demand from schools for these programs, which she argues speak to “a yearn” for more teachers.

Precisely how this affects schools depends on where they are.

In rural areas of the central coast region of California, online options have made certification more accessible, says Caprice Young, CEO and superintendent of Navigator Schools.

A charter network of four schools, Navigator has around 2,200 students in transitional kindergarten through eighth grade, and around 300 staff (about 100 are teachers). Three of the network’s schools are rural, all sitting about 40 or 50 miles outside of San Jose, with a fourth school in Hayward, wedged between San Jose and Oakland. For teachers, the schools largely rely on the Cal State University system’s TEACH program, which has a virtual credentialing option.

It’s common for Navigator schools to cultivate teachers internally, Young says. With the end of federal pandemic relief funding, Navigator schools have focused on hiring tutors and paraprofessionals who can transition into teaching roles, and they have put energy into teacher coaching programs.

But long term, this could be a problem. Tutors and paraprofessionals are now moving into vacant teaching positions, and without additional federal dollars, the schools aren’t filling as many as many of the paraprofessional jobs.

Still, the schools find themselves adding grade levels, Young says. With nearby schools dwindling because of enrollment declines, the pool of teachers they can hire has swelled.

But as other states have learned, finding more teachers isn’t the end of the woes.

Carrots and Sticks

In Texas, there’s another problem.

Recently, the governor signed H.B. 2, which bans uncertified teachers from instructing in “core” subjects (reading, math, science and social studies) in public schools by the 2029-2030 school year.

Texas has a relatively deregulated teacher preparation certification landscape, says Jacob Kirksey, an assistant professor in Texas Tech’s College of Education. A waiver from the District of Innovation policy from before the pandemic has meant that Texas public school districts don’t have to get approval from the state education agency for hiring uncertified teachers if they can demonstrate they have a shortage, Kirksey says.

Some of Kirskey’s work has suggested that, as of two years ago, half of new hires lacked credentials, a trend that disproportionately affects rural areas. Teacher shortages have been the worst in math and sciences for middle and high school, he says, a pattern that’s also worse in rural regions.

Many states appear to be following Texas’ old lead in allowing more uncertified teachers to head classrooms, Kirskey adds. In 2024, more than 365,000 teachers across 49 states plus D.C. were working without being fully certified for their positions, according to the Learning Policy Institute. And some states like South Carolina and Indiana recently passed legislation loosening credential requirements.

While this may boost the number of bodies in classrooms, it also raises questions about the quality of instruction.

Kirksey’s work has highlighted the connection between uncredentialed teachers and student achievement declines. With an average uncertified teacher, the students fall behind about three months in math and four months in reading within a single school year, he says.

Observers praised the new law in Texas for also making funds available to assist underqualified teachers in the classroom to gain credentials, which they argue will ensure teacher quality while keeping the pipelines of educators flowing, in calls with EdSurge. The law also supports university-based educator preparation programs.

Rolling Boulders Uphill

Some think that solving the problem of teacher shortages and educators who lack credentials will take more effort.

It’s not enough to rely on legislators alone to fix the problem, argues Gemar Mills, executive director of College Achieve, a network of 11 charter schools spread across three cities in New Jersey.

In New Jersey, some attempts, predating the pandemic, have kept up the flow of teachers into schools.

For example, there’s Trio Academy, a program that supports students without a college degree, helping them earn the degree and then pursue a teaching credential.

There’s also a state program — run by the New Jersey Center for Teaching and Learning — meant to boost the supply of science teachers. The program puts certified teachers through a physics graduate program before assisting them in obtaining a credential to teach the subject. Even before the pandemic, Mills embraced this; and he recalls a gym teacher completing the program and becoming a physics instructor. In recent years, the program expanded from physics into other sciences.

But the pandemic supercharged the search for alternative sources of teachers: “COVID opened the floodgates for what was allowable,” Mills says.

These days, in New Jersey, credentialing sits somewhere between the extremes of California and Texas. The pandemic inspired leniency in the state, prompting policymakers to relax standards for credentialing. Typically, becoming a credentialed teacher there involves meeting a minimum GPA, scoring well on a basic skills test, going through teaching practice and getting a college degree. But under the “limited” certification — a five-year program that started in 2022 — teachers can earn a temporary credential by completing three of those criteria.

Ultimately, Mills’ schools saw a surge of college graduates, longtime teachers’ assistants and substitutes all pivoting into full-time teaching.

But there are still challenges.

For instance, schools are capped so that only 10 percent of teachers can have that lenient credential. College Achieve has maxed out. Plus, finding science, math and special education teachers is still onerous, Mills reports.

School leaders are eager to get more teachers. But solving the problem that will require more innovative and effective certification pathways, Mill says.


Marking a Leadership Transition: Thank You, Mala

Today, we celebrate Aspire’s incredible leader, Mala Batra, who has dedicated the last 14 years to Aspire Public Schools, with the past six as CEO. This week, Mala announced that she will be transitioning out of her role as CEO at the end of this school year. While this marks the end of an extraordinary chapter, we are thrilled that she will remain part of our community in an advisory capacity as we move forward.

During her tenure, Mala has led with heart, courage, and a deep commitment to educational equity. She has guided Aspire through pivotal moments with clarity, care, and an unwavering dedication to our scholars. Mala’s leadership not only broadened opportunities for our scholars, but also helped shape the very fabric of Aspire’s work and purpose.

On behalf of the Aspire community, we extend our deepest gratitude to Mala for her extraordinary service. Her impact will be felt for years to come.

Thank you, Mala!

Commentary: California’s public charter schools — and their students — deserve equitable funding

Original EdSource article found here

COMMENTARY
By Mala Batra, Aspire CEO

In times of crisis, we should be looking for ways to help, not hinder. But in California, the inequities in public school education funding are only deepening the crisis for too many students.

On top of the devastating social-emotional and academic effects of the pandemic, our communities have been dealing with widespread staffing challenges, culture wars and frequent unfair attacks on educators. And in cities across California, projections suggest that public school enrollment will continue to drop — creating a crisis for practically all schools across the state.

Public charter schools face all of these challenges and more. At Aspire Public Schools, a charter school network serving more than 15,000 students in 36 schools across the state, our student population is more than 85% Black and Latino, and the vast majority of our students are experiencing poverty. Yet since the day we were founded, we’ve been forced to get creative with limited resources: Aspire students — like all public charter school students in California — receive less funding than their peers in traditional public schools.

According to new research from the University of Arkansas, the problem remains severe. In the 2019-20 school year, Los Angeles public charter school students received $5,226 less per-pupil funding than their counterparts in traditional public schools. In Oakland, the gap is even larger, at $7,103. This is driven by a lack of public funding. In both cities, public charter schools receive less local, state and federal funding than their counterparts in traditional public schools.

Why? While both public charters and traditional public schools receive the same amount of base funding under California’s Local Control Funding Formula, or LCFF, that doesn’t mean the total funding is equal. One reason for this is that schools receive additional funding for higher-need student categories and for higher concentrations of students in those categories, known as “concentration grants.” However, charter school concentration grant amounts are capped based on the average student demographics for the district in which they reside. This means that public charters are, in effect, penalized for serving a greater share of high-need students than their district. There are also a number of local, state and federal funding streams that are only accessible to traditional public schools —for instance, voter-approved local funding for operations or capital projects.

I’m not writing this to complain. We are honored to serve our school communities and our wonderful, talented scholars. It’s hard work, but unequal funding makes it harder. The more time we have to spend fighting tooth and nail for basic resources, the less we can spend educating California’s next generation. Our scholars are the same students whom politicians claim to want to support, especially in the wake of the pandemic, but they are consistently left out because they and their families made the choice to attend a public charter school. Elected officials frequently speak about the importance of equity, and we at Aspire couldn’t agree more. But equity means all students getting what they need — and Aspire schools (as well as many other public charter schools)serve large numbers of historically marginalized students.

This challenge is nothing new. If you talk to charter leaders across California, they’ll all tell you a similar story. Due to this systemic funding deficit, we have had no choice but to try to raise philanthropic dollars to fill critical funding gaps. But that is often turned into an attack against us, with critics saying that public charter schools are bankrolled by private investors. That is simply untrue. Trust me — I would love nothing more than to be able to operate our schools without fundraising. But it’s just not an option.

And new challenges often emerge. Just two years ago we made the choice to go to Sacramento to advocate for all public charter students to fight against legislation that would have penalized charter schools — and not traditional public schools — for following the state’s guidelines for quarantining students who were exposed to Covid-19. While we were able to win that fight, it is illustrative of the larger issue: Charter students are treated as less than others.

But here’s the thing: Despite these challenges, charter schools have been able to accomplish so much. According to new research from the CREDO Institute at Stanford University, California charter students have gained the equivalent of 11 days of reading and four days of math compared with similar students in traditional public schools. Black and Latino students and students experiencing poverty had even larger gains. At Aspire specifically, we were proud to have met CREDO’s “gap-busting” criteria in both reading and math, recognizing our ability to reduce opportunity gaps at scale.

So many of our students are carrying so much. They are talented and resilient, and they work hard to achieve their goals. We believe in them, and we tell them that every day.

But this funding gap tells them something different — that because they happen to attend a charter school, they matter less. It’s time that education leaders put childish politics aside and focus on giving all of our kids what they need. They’re all California students. They deserve to be treated as such.

•••

Mala Batra is the chief executive officer at Aspire Public Schools, a charter management organization serving 15,000 TK-12 students across 36 schools in historically underserved communities throughout California.

The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Aspire Public Schools CEO statement in response to the finalization of the California budget

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                               
August 1, 2022

Contact: Kristin Costa 
(408) 500-8555                                  
kristin@larsonpr.com 

In response to the finalization of the California budget, Aspire Public Schools CEO Mala Batra issued the following statement:

Oakland, Calif. — Through the finalization of the state budget, Governor Newsom and the legislature have agreed to reimburse classroom-based public charter schools with previously withheld funding caused by quarantined-related absences. This victory for students comes after months of educators, leaders and families advocating on behalf of all California public charter school students. 

Each time a public charter school student quarantined for the health and safety of the community, that student lost critical funding for their education. Students and schools lost millions of dollars — all during a time when investment in education and accelerated learning was more necessary than ever. 

We are grateful that Governor Newsom and California legislators solved this urgent education funding issue. Our state leaders have listened to the voices of nearly 30 leaders and over 2,500 parents, educators and community members seeking support.

Because of our collective action, nearly 1,000 public classroom-based charter schools and over 500,000 students will have access to the resources necessary to support student success. 

About Aspire Public Schools
Aspire Public Schools operates 36 community-based public charter schools educating over 15,500 students in underserved communities across California. Founded in 1998, Aspire is one of the nation’s largest open-enrollment public charter school systems serving predominantly students of color from low-income communities. Delivering a rigorous education to students in grades TK-12, College for Certain is the focus for every age group. Teachers and families partner closely to ensure scholars are prepared to succeed in college, career and life. Currently in its 21st academic year, Aspire is one of the nation’s first charter school systems. Learn more about Aspire Public Schools at aspirepublicschools.org.

Commentary: Quarantines are costing our students financially

Students at Aspire Arts & Sciences Academy, a charter public school serving grades TK-5 in Stockton, CA.
Students at Aspire Arts & Sciences Academy, a charter public school serving grades TK-5 in Stockton, CA.
Original article here.

By Mala Batra | CEO, Aspire Public Schools

Students at Aspire Arts & Sciences Academy, a charter public school serving grades TK-5 in Oakland, CA. This pandemic has cost us all in countless ways — in physical and mental health, in community, in employment, in hours and minutes with loved ones and in education. Now that we’re facing yet another surge, our schools are worried about new ways this disease is robbing us.

Our state leaders are seeking to address some of the ramifications of Covid-19. Recently, Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled a $2.7 billion Covid response plan, which would help schools receive the rapid test kits we need to keep school doors open, communities safe and kids in school.

But what happens when kids can’t be in school? What happens when thousands of students test positive or have a risk of exposure and need to quarantine?

That’s when educators are backed into a corner: By following the state-mandated student quarantine requirements, California’s public schools are losing millions of dollars — money needed for the critical work of supporting our students, keeping our staff safe and rebuilding our school communities.

In California, when a student quarantines to protect the health and safety of their school community, that same student loses money for their education.  Current state law requires schools to mark quarantined students absent, unless students sign up for independent study for the time off, and the district keeps track of their work. The Legislature agreed to hold school districts harmless for Covid absences this year, but that allowance was not extended to charter schools. Unless the law is changed, all public schools will be affected in the coming year.

When students are absent, the school doesn’t receive money for the student that day. At one of our schools, that means for a 10-day quarantine for an entire classroom, a school loses about $14,000 based on the school’s average daily attendance funding. While schools have the option of enrolling quarantined students in independent study, the process to do so is difficult — if not impossible — for families to navigate during a two-week period. Furthermore, students who receive special education services need to have an updated individualized education plan — a process that can take weeks to months — to participate in independent study. These complexities have led most public schools to mark quarantined students absent, resulting in millions of lost dollars for California students’ education.

This problem is reinforcing an issue that predated the pandemic and has been exacerbated by it: It’s disproportionately impacting students of color and those in low-income communities. Since our communities have higher infection rates than white and more affluent communities, they are more likely to need to quarantine and therefore have money taken away from their education.

At Aspire Public Schools, a charter school network with 36 schools serving over 15,000 students across the state of California, we’ve known from very early on in this pandemic that our students and their families were among the most likely to bear the brunt of this disease and its devastating impacts. More than 85% of Aspire’s scholars are Black or Latino and live in communities that are among the hardest hit across our state.

At face value, the financial implications of this law may seem like a small, even logical consequence. But it adds up. In the first few months of this school year, the delta variant wreaked havoc on our communities despite our best efforts to institute policies that would protect our students and teammates. As a result, during this time period, Aspire saw the compounding impacts of this law cost our schools $1.2 million dollars. With omicron now surging in our communities, our schools — and consequently our students — are losing even more.

Reductions in funding force schools to make devastating decisions like eliminating much-needed programming or staff — both of which would have devastating impacts on students and teachers. Educators are going above and beyond every day to support students, all while holding their own feelings of exhaustion and anxiety. We cannot keep expecting them to do more with less.

California schools are steadfastly committed to both prioritizing student learning and protecting student health. As part of protecting our community from Covid-19, we enforce quarantine and isolation protocols as necessary. As rapid tests hopefully become more readily available, we are eager to pilot “test-to-stay” programs as a means to keep more students in our classrooms. But should that enforcement really be costing our students so dearly?

With unpredictable variables, such as the omicron variant, being introduced to our landscape daily, we must ensure there aren’t financial consequences that force schools to make impossible choices between safety and learning.

There should be zero cost — to schools, and most importantly to our students — for a medically responsible and necessary quarantine. Our state leaders can and must develop a solution that allows schools to follow state-mandated quarantine requirements without losing critical funding. This pandemic has already cost our students far too much. It is our collective responsibility to lighten that burden and clear a path for healing.

•••

Mala Batra is CEO of Aspire Public Schools, California’s largest charter school network serving more than 15,000 students in the Bay Area, Central Valley and Los Angeles.

Read more at EdSource.org. The opinions in this commentary are those of the author. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.